Agenda and draft minutes

The Chairman informed those present of the actions required in the event of a fire or emergency.

a.  To receive any declarations from Members of any registerable (5A of the Code of Conduct) and/or non-registerable (5B) interests in matters to be considered at this meeting.

b.  The Town Clerk to receive written requests for dispensations prior to the start of the meeting for consideration.

a.  To receive any declarations from Members of any registerable (5A of the Code of Conduct) and/or non-registerable (5B) interests in matters to be considered at this meeting.

None received.

b.  The Town Clerk to receive written requests for dispensations prior to the start of the meeting for consideration.

None received.

Please note: Any member of the public requiring to speak about a planning application should register by email no later than three working days before the meeting where the application will be considered.

Members of the public are advised to review the Receiving Public Questions, Representations and Evidence at Meetings document prior to attending the meeting.

A member of the public, on behalf of the resident who submitted the question, read the Public Question in accordance with the Town Council’s Public Question Policy.

As the public question related to Agenda Item 9, To receive and note a presentation from Persimmon Homes regarding Latchbrook Farm, the Chairman announced that Agenda Item 9 would be brought forward and that the response to the public question would be taken under that item.

The Chairman welcomed representatives from Persimmon Homes to the meeting.

Chris Thorne, Head of External Affairs, and Jamie Grant, Head of Land and Planning, gave a presentation on an outline planning application relating to proposed development on land west of Latchbrook Farm.

The presenters introduced themselves and outlined their roles, emphasising their commitment to engage with the local community. Background information was provided on Persimmon Homes, its operations across Cornwall and West Devon and its intention to work collaboratively with local authorities to support housing delivery within Cornwall.

They highlighted that the company has a strong track record of providing homes for locals. Homes are typically 25% cheaper than most competitors, achieved through vertical integration and control of the supply chain, allowing costs to be consolidated. They emphasised that its contractor base is predominantly local, supporting local employment.

It was clarified that the company does not currently own the Latchbrook site but holds an option over the land, with planning permission to be sought at the appropriate time on behalf of the landowners. Subject to approval, Persimmon would then proceed with purchasing the site.

The presenters outlined the work undertaken since the site was submitted to Cornwall Council two years ago as part of the call for sites process, and provided an overview of the consultation timeline, including public engagement events and discussions with consultees.

Key issues raised during consultation included infrastructure, flood risk, and the relationship with neighbouring developments such as Treleden. The outline application proposes 300 homes and a community hub, with its final use to be shaped through ongoing local feedback. It was noted that while specific services cannot be guaranteed, the developer can provide necessary infrastructure and create opportunities for facilities.

The technical aspects of the proposal were summarised, including a revision to the access arrangements following feedback from National Highways, potential interest from stagecoach providing a bus service, and the intention to provide 58% open space on the site, with biodiversity net gain expected to exceed 10%.

It was highlighted that drainage assessments and ground water monitoring are currently ongoing. The design of the development aims to reflect local character, with a green corridor and open spaces across different parts of the site.

The public question submitted were answered within the presentation as follows:

1.    Responsibility for maintaining public open space (POS) will reside with the Management Company (ManCo) for the site, which will be established should planning permission be secured and is standard practice across new-build developments. At the start, directors of the ManCo will be senior figures from Persimmon Homes Cornwall & West Devon – to be clear, these roles are not remunerated positions. When the site is complete, they will resign allowing for residents of the site to take control. The ManCo is funded through financial contributions from residents of the site in a manner similar to how leaseholders in a block of flat would contribute towards a communal pot to manage common areas.

2. During the determination process with Cornwall Council, the statutory  ...  view the full minutes text for item 4/26/27

a.  Applications for consideration;

PA26/02250

Persimmon Homes Cornwall – Land West of Latchbrook Farm Trematon Cornwall PL12 4RJ

Outline permission with some matters reserved (appearance, landscaping, layout and scale) for residential-led development, including site preparatory works as necessary; up to 300 residential units (Use Class C3); a community/mobility hub approximately 0.05ha, including uses in the use classes defined as E(a)/E(c)/F2(a) (up to 225sqm GIA), with associated car parking, landscaping works and public realm; other open space including amenity green space, natural and semi-natural green spaces, equipped and natural play spaces; associated infrastructure and internal estate roads.

Ward: Trematon

Date received: 13 April 2026

Response date: 4 May 2026

The Chair noted that several public objections had been submitted on the Cornwall Council website.

Members discussed the application received with a focus on infrastructure capacity, access concerns and whether the timing of further development was appropriate.

Members discussed how and when contributions toward local facilities would be determined. It was advised by the Chair that infrastructure provision would be determined by Cornwall Council.

Concerns were raised that local infrastructure, particularly schools and the road network were already significantly under pressure and that further housing should not precede essential investment in these areas.

Some Members highlighted the ongoing Treleden development, suggesting it was too soon to assess its full impact before considering additional large scale housing developments.

Access arrangements were a concern, with comments that the proposed access appeared unsafe and was shoehorned into the existing layout, questioning its suitability for a development of this scale.

The Chair noted that the proposal conflicts with both the Saltash Neighbourhood Development Plan and Cornwall’s Local Plan. The development is beyond the settlement boundary and was considered unjustified in protected countryside and open land area adjacent to the boundary line.

It was further stated that the proposed mitigation did not outweigh the harm to the spatial strategy, and that approving the application could undermine public confidence in the adopted planning policy.

Following a vote (9 in favour, 0 against, 1 abstentions), it was proposed by Councillor Miller, seconded by Councillor Johns and was resolved to RECOMMEND REFUSAL on the basis of the following points:

1.    The proposal conflicts with the Saltash Neighbourhood Plan and Cornwall’s Local Plan as it would result in development in an unsustainable location not supported by adopted planning policy;

2.    The site lies outside the defined settlement boundary, is not allocated for development and is designated as protected countryside / open land within the Saltash Neighbourhood Plan. The proposed development is therefore considered unjustified and contrary to policies which seek to direct growth to sustainable locations;

3.    Existing infrastructure capacity, including schools, highways and local services, is insufficient to support development of the scale proposed, and that no adequate or timely mitigation has been demonstrated as part of the proposal;

4.    The proposed access arrangements were considered unsafe and unsuitable for a development of this scaleand likely to give rise to highway safety issues.

The Chair thanked both the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 5/26/27

Please see a copy of the minutes on the STC website or request to see a copy at the Guildhall.

Following a vote (9 in favour, 0 against, 1 abstentions), it was proposed by Councillor B Samuels, seconded by Councillor Ashburn and RESOLVED that the minutes of the Planning and Licensing Committee held on 17 March 2026 were confirmed as a true and correct record.

Members agreed to take Agenda Items 6 and 7 together.

Members noted the inclusion of Town Vision’s recommendations on planning and licensing achievements against the Committee’s objectives.

It was RESOLVED to note.

Nothing to report.

a.  Applications for consideration:

PA26/00940

Mr Brian Venables Brunel Recycling Limited – Roodscroft Waste Management Facility Roodscroft Hatt Saltash PL12 6PJ

Waste management facility and associated activities, including the erection and operation of a wash plant, raising the height of the existing waste materials building, extension to the workshop and provision of a sustainable drainage scheme

Ward: Trematon

Date received: 12 March 2026

Response date: Extended to 22 April 2026

https://planning.cornwall.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=TAAOU6FGHCJ00

PA26/01946

Mr Darren Bennetts – Sunnycourt Carkeel Saltash Cornwall PL12 6NR

Single story two bedroom detached dwelling with two parking spaces; with two parking spaces also retained for the existing dwelling

Ward: Trematon

Date received: 10 April 2026

Response date: 1 May 2026

https://planning.cornwall.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=TC7HH9FGFXY00

PA26/02250

Persimmon Homes Cornwall – Land West of Latchbrook Farm Trematon Cornwall PL12 4RJ

Outline permission with some matters reserved (appearance, landscaping, layout and scale) for residential-led development, including site preparatory works as necessary; up to 300 residential units (Use Class C3); a community/mobility hub approximately 0.05ha, including uses in the use classes defined as E(a)/E(c)/F2(a) (up to 225sqm GIA), with associated car parking, landscaping works and public realm; other open space including amenity green space, natural and semi-natural green spaces, equipped and natural play spaces; associated infrastructure and internal estate roads.

Ward: Trematon

Date received: 13 April 2026

Response date: 4 May 2026

https://planning.cornwall.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=TCTP50FGM7X00

PA26/01524

Mr Nigel Palk – Myrtle Cottage Fairmead Road Saltash Cornwall PL12 4JQ

Replace roof to garden room and extend to back of house. Convert garage to bedroom and utility/WC.

Ward: Tamar

Date received: 14 April 2026

Response date: 5 May 2026

https://planning.cornwall.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=TBFPIXFGKR600

b.  Tree applications:

None received.

c.   Tree notifications:

None received.

a.  Applications for consideration:

PA26/00940

Mr Brian Venables Brunel Recycling Limited – Roodscroft Waste

Management Facility Roodscroft Hatt Saltash PL12 6PJ

Waste management facility and associated activities, including the

erection and operation of a wash plant, raising the height of the existing

waste materials building, extension to the workshop and provision of a

sustainable drainage scheme

Ward: Trematon

Date received: 12 March 2026

Response date: Extended to 22 April 2026

The Chair noted that a high number of consultee comments had been made but were expected due to the nature of the proposal.

Members acknowledged the benefits of the development to the waste facility, including improved recycling measures and additional local employment, but raised concerns regarding the recent removal of trees resulting in increased visibility of the building in an area in close proximity to an area of natural beauty.

The Chair read out comments from Tamar Valley National Landscape, confirming that the site is not within the designated national landscape but lies within its immediate landscape setting. The Chair also noted that the applicants landscape plans include substantial tree planting around the edge of the development.

Members felt further clarification was required, as the landscaping and screening shown at pre-application stage appeared not to be evident. The increased height and visual impact of the building were considered more imposing than previously understood due to the recent removal of existing trees.

It was proposed by Councillor Miller, seconded by Councillor McCaw and recommended to refuse due to:

1.    Lack of detail regarding the landscaping;

2.    Overdevelopment of the site;

3.    The existing structure is more visually imposing due to the increased height.

Following a vote of 4 in favour and 6 against the motion was not carried.

Subsequently, following a vote (7 in favour, 3 against, 0 abstentions), it was proposed by Councillor Bullock, seconded by Councillor Ashburn and resolved to RECOMMEND APPROVAL subject to clarification of more substantial landscaping plan.

PA26/01946

Mr Darren Bennetts – Sunnycourt Carkeel Saltash Cornwall PL12 6NR

Single story two bedroom detached dwelling with two parking spaces; with two parking spaces also retained for the existing dwelling

Ward: Trematon

Date received: 10 April 2026

Response date: 1 May 2026

Following a unanimous vote, it was proposed by Councillor Stoyel, seconded by Councillor McCaw and resolved to RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

PA26/01524

Mr Nigel Palk – Myrtle Cottage Fairmead Road Saltash Cornwall PL12 4JQ

Replace roof to garden room and extend to back of house. Convert garage to bedroom and utility/WC.

Ward: Tamar

Date received: 14 April 2026

Response date: 5 May 2026

Councillor Stoyel left the meeting.

Following a unanimous vote, it was proposed by Councillor Johns, seconded by Councillor Gillies and resolved to RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

b.  Tree applications:

None received.

c.   Tree notifications:

None received.

Councillor Stoyel returned to the meeting.

Following a unanimous vote, it was proposed by Councillor Bullock, seconded by Councillor Nowlan and resolved to RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

To resolve that pursuant to Section 1(2) of the Public Bodies (Admission to meetings) Act 1960 the public and press leave the meeting because of the confidential nature of the business to be transacted.

To resolve that Pursuant to Section 1(2) of the Public Bodies (Admissions to Meetings) Act 1960 the public and press leave the meeting because of the confidential nature of the business to be transacted.

None.

To resolve that the public and press be re-admitted to the meeting.

To resolve that the public and press be re-admitted to the meeting.

None.